.{"id":6389,"date":"2026-03-29T20:26:34","date_gmt":"2026-03-29T17:26:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/openrestitution.africa\/?post_type=policy-record&#038;p=6389"},"modified":"2026-03-29T20:26:36","modified_gmt":"2026-03-29T17:26:36","slug":"spoliation-advisory-panel","status":"publish","type":"policy-record","link":"https:\/\/openrestitution.africa\/fr\/policy-record\/spoliation-advisory-panel\/","title":{"rendered":"Spoliation Advisory Panel"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Objectifs : <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The UK Government calls for stronger measures to return Nazi-looted art to its original owners and participates in European conferences dedicated to the issue, operating primarily through existing legal mechanisms and Washington Principles compliance. A policy-based approach relying on voluntary compliance without dedicated commission structure. The Spoliation Advisory Panel (SAP) is the UK&#8217;s dedicated, permanent advisory panel for Nazi-looted cultural property claims. It was established in 2000.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br><strong>Mesures de restitution\u00a0:<\/strong><br>Government policy statements supporting fair restitution. Participation in international conferences and initiatives. Encouragement of voluntary returns by institutions. Support for provenance research Case-by-case assessment approach. While its recommendations are not legally binding on institutions, the SAP provides a formal, structured alternative to litigation. Institutions almost always follow its recommendations, and the government can exert significant moral and political pressure for compliance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><br>Limitations du cadre :<\/strong><br>Even though the SAP is a reactive, claims-based body, its inception is the proactive measure the UK did create to address this issue systematically.<br>D\u00e9pendance \u00e0 la conformit\u00e9 volontaire des institutions.<br>No specific legislation mandating restitution.<br>Limited systematic approach compared to continental European frameworks. Focus on moral obligations rather than legal requirements. The limitations apply to the lack of a legal mandate, not the lack of a commission structure.<\/p>","protected":false},"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"iawp_total_views":0},"country":[241],"framework-type":[211],"class_list":["post-6389","policy-record","type-policy-record","status-publish","hentry","country-united-kingdom","framework-type-national-frameworks"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/openrestitution.africa\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/policy-record\/6389","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/openrestitution.africa\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/policy-record"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/openrestitution.africa\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/policy-record"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/openrestitution.africa\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6389"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/openrestitution.africa\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/country?post=6389"},{"taxonomy":"framework-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/openrestitution.africa\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/framework-type?post=6389"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}